While the politicians, scientists and now even bishops and ministers are eyeing the future to claim their respective stakes in it, and while there are that class of non clerical souls whose hopes have been dashed, yet are rearing families and are contributing to society, polity, and family, these last can be those degeneratively reminiscent ghosts in the machine who, not looking forward, yet find their hope in the past, and in so doing, have engendered the clumsy, at times convoluted language of the past, and hence carry it forward, if only by translating it into the present.
The ancient greeks bemoaned the youths of their day and longed for the good ol' days. Cumulatively speaking, and perhaps most friendly to Judaism and Christianity, Stoicism, which seemed to be the pagan monotheism, called for a dispassionate attitude toward life, where one was to prepare onesself for the buffets of Fortune, and to accept the nastier side of things with equanimity and even inner grace working outward. This is an important time, when Death was prevalent, where around four in one hundred men reached the age of fifty, and much less than this women and children.
In the face of Death, Eros offered a counterbalance in first the greek, then the greek alexandrian, then the roman way of life. A gentleman, while married, could still make congress with his slaves, who were his property, as long as the shenanigans were kept under wraps, beneath the calm, poised veneer of gentlemanly society.
In this dichotomy of Death and the Ultimate on one side, and ribauldery on the other, the Stoic declared the refined man showed constraint, if not restraint, in the passions. The pagan was shown to be capable of a moral life much like the jew, and this is what most impressed the primitive christian fathers of the day. Had not the greeks and romans developed an attitude, an ethos, that mirrored the hebrews, the church fathers never would have looked to Plotinus in the way they did and as an intellectual, if not spiritual forebear.
The pagan, who surely made a favorable impression on both Jesus and Paul, their exhortations and reasonings gave props to the exterior forces within which they were flourishing. And even before, at the epiphany, the Magi, thought to be either arabian or persian, followed the star of the hebrew king, and in their turn honored this newborn royal at his birth. These Magi, certainly made other appearances to other kings, be they roman, persian or greek. And yet there is no story of them being converted, or more needing conversion, in the canonical gospels.
So this is why some look to the past, before christianity became the darling of empire. There is seen to be a wild, rangy, completely undogmatic free exchange of ideas between all the prophets of orthodoxy as well as heresy. Simon Magus, the Gnostic, was branded with 'simony', the want of gaining spiritual power by purchasing it with gold coin. But he was only reasoned with, and certainly not burned at any stake. The most violent either Jesus or any of his original followers became was Peter when he cut off the roman guard's ear, which Jesus promptly repaired, and Jesus Himself, when he attacked the moneychangers in the second temple, but giving them no more harrassment, than to drive them from His Father's house.
So there is Liberality, in Grace, in thought, in philosophy, in religion, found in patched throughout the past where the promise of freedom and democracy and liberty can thrive, and the most number can be the most happy most of the time. 'If we've done it before, we can do it again', I might say here.
Looking to the past, in many respects, is like a respectable way to revolt against the ways are tending. If the church is become too dogmatic and has stripped the sacred Cosmos bare of all manner of spirits, demons, angels and archangels, and attempted to bury the Magic that has always validated it in all of it's many guises, and one feels like one is missing something, then since one can't remember the future, one can then remember the past.
Personally, a reason I look to the past is because those people were closer to Birth. Birth of the Individual. Birth of the family. Birth of the town, the city, the state, the country, the empire. There is something about beginnings, primal they are, creating order from chaos, where tribal man dusts himself off and trods to the city in hopes that if he can make it there, he can make it anywhere. And the problems man then grappled with were the important ones. The shortness of life, the ubiquity of injustice, how to properly worship the Divine, what place was man in the Cosmos. All haunting questions that in the past have been answered, only to be lost, and now then have been gained again.
But enough.